|Systemic Election Fraud: A Conspiracy Fact - not a Theory by Richard Charnin|
December 27, 2011
Election Fraud is systemic. Numerical and anecdotal evidence shows that it has resulted in four stolen presidential elections since 1968.
And it is getting worse. Republicans are open in the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible voters. Right-wing corporations manufacture unverifiable voting machines and miscount the votes. Democrats have avoided discussing election fraud even though they are the ones most adversely affected. One must assume that they are part of the problem. But the American public is largely unaware of the magnitude of the problem.
The Recorded Vote has deviated sharply from the True Vote in every election since 1968. Yes, it is true: unadjusted exit polls have always been accurate. They closely matched the True Vote in 2000, 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010. However, final exit polls have exactly matched the fraudulent Recorded Vote because they have been forced to do so.
There is no question but that the 2012 election will be fraudulent.
The bedrock of the evidence derives from this undisputed fact: Final national and state exit polls are always forced to match the Recorded Vote – even if doing so requires an impossible turnout of prior election voters and implausible vote shares. All demographic categories are adjusted to conform to the Recorded Vote. To use these forced final exit polls as the basis for election research is unscientific and irresponsible. The research is based on the bogus premise that the Recorded Vote is sacrosanct and represents how people actually voted. Nothing can be further from the truth.
It is a documented fact that millions of votes are uncounted in every election. The Census Bureau indicates that since 1968, approximately 80 million more votes were cast than recorded. And these are just the uncounted votes. What about the votes switched on unverifiable voting machines and central tabulators? But vote miscounts are only part of the story. The True Vote analysis does not include the millions of potential voters who were illegally disenfranchised and never got to vote.
My book, Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes, and the National Exit Poll, is a detailed analysis which proves that the recorded vote is always different from the True Vote. Unlike the misinformation spread in the media, voting machine “glitches” are not due to machine failures. It’s the fault of the humans who program them.
Election forecasters, academics, political scientists and main stream media pundits never discuss or analyze the statistical evidence that proves election fraud is systemic - beyond a reasonable doubt. My website contains a compilation of presidential, congressional and senatorial election analyses based on pre-election polls, unadjusted exit polls and associated True Vote Models. Those who never discuss or analyze election fraud should focus on the factual and statistical data and run the models. If anyone wants to refute the analytical evidence, they are encouraged to do so in a response. Election forecasters, academics and political scientists are welcome to review the content.
It is often stated that exit polls were very accurate in elections prior to 2004, but have deviated sharply from the vote since. The statement is a misconception; it is based on a comparison of final exit polls in elections prior to 2004 and preliminary exit polls since. It's apples and oranges. Final exit polls published in the media have always been forced to match the recorded vote. That's why they appear to have been accurate.
In the 1968-2008 Presidential elections, the Republicans won the recorded vote by a 49-45% margin. The Recursive National True Vote Model indicates that the Democrats actually won by 49-45%.
In the 1988-2008 elections, the Democrats won the average of the unadjusted state exit polls 51.6-41.8%. The 3% exit poll margin of error was exceeded in 148 state elections, of which 138 shifted to the Republican. The proof is in the 1988-2008 Unadjusted State Exit Polls Statistical Reference on my website: www.richardcharnin.com
April 29, 2016
NO. IT'S not "us" and "them".